Go to Home Page Conservationtech.com, Building Conservation Technology
|
During the Data Collection Form review process, it is critically important that the Basic Structural Hazard Scores and Score Modifiers, which are described in detail in Chapter 3 in FEMA 154, not be changed without input from professional engineers familiar with earthquake-resistant design and chief building official, plan checkers, and other design professionals experienced in seismic design to identify the years in which the affected jurisdiction initially adopted and enforced seismic codes (if ever) for the building lateral-force-resisting structural systems considered by the RVS procedure. Since municipal codes are generally adopted by the city council, another source for this information, in many municipalities, is the city clerk's office. In addition to determining the year in which seismic codes were initially adopted and enforced, the user should also determine (1) the benchmark years in which substantially improved seismic codes were adopted and enforced for the various lateral-load-resisting systems and (2) the year in which anchorage requirements for cladding were adopted and enforced. These dates should be inserted on the Quick Reference Guide (Appendix B) that has been created to facilitate the use of the Data Collection Form (see Figure 2-3). During the Data Collection Form review process, it is critically important that the Basic Structural Hazard Scores and Score Modifiers, which are described in detail in Chapter 3, not be changed without input from professional engineers familiar with earthquake-resistant design and chief building official, plan checkers, and other design professionals experienced in seismic design to identify the years in which the affected jurisdiction initially adopted and enforced seismic codes (if ever) for the building lateral-force-resisting structural systems considered by the RVS procedure. Since municipal codes are generally adopted by the city council, another source for this information, in many municipalities, is the city clerk's office. An S score of 2 is suggested as a "cut-off", based on present seismic design criteria. Using this cut-off level, buildings having an S score of 2 or less should be investigated by a design professional experienced in seismic design (see Section 3.9, 4.1 and 4.2 of FEMA 154 (2002 edition) for additional information on this issue). Determination of Cut-Off Score Use of the RVS on a community-wide basis enables the user to divide screened buildings into two categories: those that are expected to have acceptable seismic performance, and those that may be seismically hazardous and should be studied further. This requires that the user to determine, preferably as part of the pre-planning process, an appropriate "cut-off" score.
The Master sheet contains the following headings not included in the building type tab because they do not have factors in the FEMA 154 Data Collection Form. They are included in the Master because they are elements that should also be considered in the data collection process. It will be up to the user to determine how the information in these categories will influence the results determined from the spreadsheet as a whole.
|
Website by © Randolph Langenbach M-Arch (Harvard), Dipl.Conservation (York, England)
FAX: 801-730-1616 Writings and photographs found on this website is ©Randolph Langenbach and other authors. For use permission, write to the address above. Please send your reactions, comments or questions regarding this website to the Email address above |