I.
Typical
Damages
When
strong
earthquake
shaking
occurs, a
building
is thrown
mostly
from side
to side,
and also
up and
down. That
is, while
the ground
is
violently
moving
from side
to side,
taking the
building
foundation
with it,
the
building
structure
tends to
stay at
rest,
similar to
a
passenger
standing
on a bus
that
accelerates
quickly.
Once the
building
starts
moving, it
tends to
continue
in the
same
direction,
but the
ground
moves back
in the
opposite
direction
(as if the
bus driver
first
accelerated
quickly,
then
suddenly
braked).
Thus the
building
gets
thrown
back and
forth by
the motion
of the
ground,
with some
parts of
the
building
lagging
behind the
foundation
movement,
and then
moving in
the
opposite
direction.
The
force F
that an
upper
floor
level or
roof level
of the
building
should
successfully
resist is
related to
its mass m
and
its
acceleration
a,
according
to Newton’s
law, F
= ma.
The
heavier
the
building
the more
the force
is
exerted.
Therefore,
a tall,
heavy,
reinforced
concrete
building
will be
subject to
more force
than a
lightweight,
one-story,
wood-frame
house,
given the
same
acceleration.
Damage
can be due
either to
structural
members
(beams and
columns)
being
overloaded
or
differential
movements
between
different
parts of
the
structure.
If the
structure
is
sufficiently
strong to
resist
these
forces or
differential
movements,
little
damage
will
result. If
the
structure
cannot
resist
these
forces or
differential
movements,
structural
members
will be
damaged,
and
collapse
may occur.
Building
damage is
related to
the
characteristics
of the
building,
and the
duration
and
severity
of the
ground
shaking.
Larger
earthquakes
tend to
shake
longer and
harder and
therefore
cause more
damage to
structures.
Earthquakes
with
Richter
magnitudes
less than
5 rarely
cause
significant
damage to
buildings,
since
acceleration
levels
(except
when the
site is on
the fault)
are
relatively
small and
the
durations
of shaking
for these
earthquakes
are
relatively
short. In
addition
to damage
caused by
ground
shaking,
damage can
be caused
by
buildings
pounding
against
one
another,
ground
failure
that
causes the
degradation
of the
building
foundation,
landslides,
fires and
tidal
waves
(tsunamis).
Most of
these “indirect”
forms of
damage are
not
addressed
in this
Handbook.
(from FEMA
154, p133)
II.
Examples
of
Mitigation
Measures
for
protection
of life
and
reduction
in damage.
The
following
mitigation
measures
were
described
and
illustrated
by FEMA
Region X
for
publication
in the
printed
version of
this
Handbook.
The have
here been
reorganized
under the
specific
building
type to
which they
relate.
Some
illustrations
may relate
to several
types, so
they may
not be
representative
of the
specific
building
type
discussed.
This list
of
measures
is not
comprehensive,
and may be
expanded
as more
material
is placed
on this
site.
Also, they
are meant
only to be
representative
of the
kinds of
measures
that have
been
proven to
be
effective,
rather
than
provide
details on
how the
measure
could be
implemented.
General
Structural
Mitigation
Measures:
- SOFT/WEAK
STORY
(1st
floor):
-
FLEXIBLE
DIAPHRAGMS:
-
POUNDING:
Alternative
Structural
Technologies
to
Consider:
General
Enclosure
and
Interior
Element
Mitigation
Measures:
- HEAVY
ARCHITECTURAL
EXTERIOR
ELEMENTS
- WINDOWS
- PARAPETS:
- CHIMNEYS:
-
INTERIOR
PARTITIONS
- CEILINGS
AND
LIGHTS
- RAISED
COMPUTER
FLOORS
Wood
Frame
Structures
(W).
Well-designed
wood
structures
have
generally
performed
well in
earthquakes.
Failures
are often
due to
lack of
foundation
anchorage
or
unbraced
crawlspace
(cripple)
walls.
(W1)
WOOD
-
LIGHT
FRAME
(W2)
WOOD
-
HEAVY
TIMBER
(Commercial
and
Industrial
Buildings).
Steel
Frame
Structures
(S).
These
structures
generally
perform
better
than other
structure
types.
Steel
moment
frame
structures
may have
damage to
primary
members,
distress
at
connections,
and broken
or buckled
braces and
brace
connections.
Excessive
Movement
between
floor
levels
(story
drift) can
cause
nonstructural
damage.
GENERAL:
ALL
STEEL
TYPES
(S1)
STEEL:
MOMENT
RESISTING
FRAME
(S2)
STEEL:
BRACED
FRAME
(S3)
STEEL:
LIGHT
FRAME
(S4)
STEEL:
FRAME
WITH
REINFORCED
CONCRETE
SHEAR
WALLS
(S5)
STEEL:
FRAME
WITH
UNREINFORCED
MASONRY
INFILL
Reinforced
Concrete
Structures
(C).
Concrete
structures
may be
cast-in-place
and/or
precast.
Cast-in-place
Concrete
Structures.
Most
typical
of
reinforced
concrete
buildings,
cast-in-place
concrete
structures
can
be
damaged
to
the
point
of
collapse,
if
the
design
or
detailing
is
inadequate.
The
most
vulnerable
buildings
are
those
constructed
as
frame
structures
without
shearwalls,
and
with
minimal
ductility
in
the
beam/column
intersections,
and
inadequate
ties
in
the
columns.
Usually
such
vulnerable
buildings
were
constructed
after
architectural
styles
favored
open
office
or
shop
plans
with
exterior
light-weight
metal
and
glass
curtain
walls,
and
before
building
codes
[DO
LINK
TO
BENCHMARK
YEARS]
were
altered
to
require
ductile
detailing.
GENERAL:
ALL
REINFORCED
CONCRETE
(RC)
TYPES
(C1)
RC:
MOMENT-RESISTING
FRAME
(C2)
RC:
FRAME
WITH
RC
SHEAR
WALLS
(C3)
RC:
FRAME
WITH
INFILL
MASONRY
WALLS
Precast
Concrete
Structures.
Precast
structures
also
may
experience
damage
in
joints
and
connections.
Older
"non-ductile"
pre-cast
concrete
structures
are
vulnerable
to
collapse
because
earthquake
damage
was
concentrated
in
the
intersections
between
the
pre-cast
parts.
A
subset
of
precast
concrete
structures,
tilt-up
construction
has
in
the
past
proven
to
be
particularly
vulnerable
to
earthquake
damage.
This
construction
method
usually
involves
casting
concrete
walls
at
the
site
and
"tilting"
them
into
place.
The
most
common
failure
is
wall-roof
separation
resulting
from
inadequate
ties.
Other
problems
are
weak
connections
between
individual
wall
panels,
failure
of
diaphragms
and
exterior
elements,
and
failure
in
panels
with
large
openings.
(PC1)
PRE-CAST
RC:
TILT-UP
BUILDINGS
with
large
flexible
diaphragms.
(PC2)
PRE-CAST
RC:
PRE-CAST
FRAME
BUILDINGS
Masonry
Structures
(M).
There are
two kinds
of masonry
construction:
unreinforced
and
reinforced.
Unreinforced
masonry
structures,
particularly
bearing
walls, are
the form
of
construction
most
vulnerable
to
earthquake
damages.
Floors and
walls of
these
structures
are often
not tied
together
or, when
tied
together,
are only
weakly
connected.
Some older
structures
have
mortar
that has
deteriorated.
Long,
unreinforced
masonry
wall
sections,
unsupported
by
intersecting
cross-walls,
are
particularly
prone to
severe
cracking
or failure
due to the
lack of
bracing or
reinforcing
steel.
Chimneys
in older
buildings
are
commonly
damaged or
destroyed,
creating
falling
hazards.
GENERAL:
ALL
MASONRY
TYPES
(RM)
REINFORCED
MASONRY:
WITH
FLEXIBLE
DIAPHRAGMS
(RM)
REINFORCED
MASONRY:
WITH
PRE-CAST
RC
DIAPHRAGMS
(URM)
UNREINFORCED
MASONRY
:
NOTE:
The
"considerations"
with the
symbols
that link
to Appendix
A:
Regulations
have not
been
included
in this
web
version of
this
publication.
At this
time,
items such
as cost,
professional
practice,
and
regulations
are so
often
determined
by the
particular
case, that
the
generalizations
made by
these
symbols
may not
always be
relevant.
It is
recommended
that
Appendix A
be
reviewed
for all
mitigation
measures.
|