Introduction
Problem:
Damage
or failure
of a
culvert
caused by
erosion of
the
embankment
at its
entrance
and/or
outlet, or
around the
outside of
the
culvert.
The
embankment
erosion
and
subsequent
culvert
damage or
failure
may be a
result of
inadequate
culvert
end
sections.
Mitigation
Objective:
To
prevent
future
damage to
a pipe
culvert by
adding
appropriate
end
sections.
C.1.
Shape
Culvert
Entrance
Shape
culvert
entrance (bevel/skew)
to match
the
embankment
slope or
stream
alignment.
Culvert
efficiency
will be
increased,
and
turbulence
at the
entrance
and
through
the
culvert
will be
decreased,
reducing
erosion of
the bank.
CLICK
ON IMAGES
TO ENLARGE
Effectiveness:
Limitations:
- Cutting
a
culvert
to
bevel
or
skew
its
entrance
may
weaken
a
large
diameter
culvert's
ability
to
resist
ring
compression;
flanges
may
be
required
to
stiffen
it.
Considerations:

Construct
sheet
steel, low
height, cutoff
wall
to prevent
undermining
of culvert
entrance.
The
sheeting
should
extend
below the
culvert
entrance
to at
least one
half times
the
culvert
diameter
and above
the
culvert
entrance
to a point
where it
meets the
junction
of the
embankment
with other
end
treatments.

Effectiveness:
Limitations:
- Streambed
geology
may
prohibit
installation
of
cutoff
wall.
Considerations:

Construct
an endwalls,
wingwalls,
and/or flared
end
section
to direct
flow into
and out of
the
culvert
and
protect
embankment
slopes.
Straight
or
"U"
shaped
endwalls
or flared
wingwalls
may be
used when
the
centerline
of the
stream is
aligned
with the
culvert. A
"U"
shaped
endwall or
wingwall
may be
used when
an abrupt
change in
the flow
direction
is
necessary.
An
"L"
shaped
endwall
may be
constructed
to
redirect
the flow
to the
angle of
the
culvert.

Effectiveness:
Limitations:
- Straight
endwalls
may
decrease
culvert
capacities,
but
rounding
of
the
entrance
corners
may
offset
it.
- If
stream
velocities
are
high,
lateral
scour
of
embankments
may
result
from
eddies
at
the
culvert
end
sections.
- Attaching
fabricated
flared
end
sections
to
culvert
entrances
and
outlets
may
cause
separation
of
culvert
joints
if
the
culvert
cannot
support
additional
weight.
Considerations:

C.4.
Construct
an Energy
Dissipater
Construct
an energy
dissipater
to
minimize
scouring
at the
culvert
outlet.
Energy
dissipater
designs
may
include
concrete
or rock
sloping
aprons,
"bucket"
outlets
that throw
the jet
downstream,
stilling
basins, or
other more
elaborate
structures.

Effectiveness:
- Very
effective.
Especially
effective
when
there
is
a
significant
drop
from
the
bottom
of
the
outflow
end
of
the
culvert
to
the
drainage
flow
line,
or
when
the
gradient
of
the
culvert
is
steep.
- If
stream
velocities
are
high,
may
be
needed
to
eliminate
lateral
scour.
Limitations:
- Stream
channel
geometry
may
dictate
the
design
of
energy
dissipaters.
- Depending
on
existing
conditions,
stream
velocity,
and
depth
of
pool,
measure
may
have
considerable
impacts
on
fish.
Considerations:

C.5.
Extend
Culvert
Inlet or
Outlet
Extend
culvert
entrance
and/or
outlet
past the
embankment
face.

Effectiveness:
- Moderately
effective
in
reducing
turbulence
at
culvert
entrance.
- Moderately
effective
in
reducing
erosion
of
the
downstream
embankment,
but
can
cause
erosion
to
upstream
embankment
due
to
eddies.
- Consider
energy
dissipaters,
embankment
slope
protection,
and
debris
barriers
to
maximize
effectiveness.
Limitations:
- Extensions
can
cause
scour
of
the
streambed
downstream.
- Extensions
are
vulnerable
to
flow
and
debris
impacts.
Considerations:
