Introduction
Problem:
Damage to
bridge
decks and
associated
superstructures
(railings
and truss)
as a
result of
overtopping
due to
insufficient
capacity
for flow
through
the bridge
opening.
Mitigation
Objective:
To prevent
damage to
bridge
decks and
associated
superstructures
by
increasing
the design
capacity
for the
bridge
opening,
and/or
modifying
the bridge
deck
design to
allow for
controlled
overflow.
The
bridge
deck and
associated
superstructure
should be elevated
to a level
sufficient
to pass
anticipated
flood
flows.
Approach
sections
to the
bridge may
likewise
need to be
raised

Effectiveness:
- Most
effective
mitigation
for
passing
flood
flows.
Limitations:
- The
pier
and
abutment
supports
may
need
to
be
redesigned
to
accommodate
and
support
the
elevated
bridge
deck
and
associated
superstructure
Considerations:

Replacing
a steel
truss
bridge
with an
open deck
bridge
will
reduce the
backwater
conditions
upstream,
and
eliminate
the
accumulation
of debris
should the
bridge
become
over-topped
during
flood
events.

Effectiveness:
- Generally
very
effective
- An
open
deck
bridge
does
not
trap
floating
debris
to
the
same
extent
that
a
steel
truss
bridge
will
when
overtopped
- effectiveness
is
increased
if
open
deck
bridge
is
elevated
Limitations:
- Bridge
piers
and
abutments
may
require
extensive
redesign
to
accommodate
open
deck
bridge
Considerations:
 
Replace
the
multiple
spans of a
bridge
with a
single
clear-span
to
eliminate
the need
for piers.
This will
increase
the flow
through
the bridge
and reduce
upstream
backwater
conditions.

Effectiveness:
Limitations:
- Length
of
span
may
be
limited
by
strength
of
materials.
Considerations:

Increase
the size
of the
bridge
opening(s)
by
lengthening
the
opening or
raising
the bridge
deck.
Increasing
bridge
opening
size will
decrease
any
backwater
conditions
upstream
from the
bridge and
reduce the
effects of
drawdown
through
the
bridge.

Effectiveness:
- Very
effective.
Particularly
effective
where
damage
was
caused
by
overtopping
of
the
bridge
due
to
excessively
high
water
surface
elevations
upstream
or
by
excessively
high
water
velocities
eroding
the
pier
and
abutment
foundations.
- Degree
of
effectiveness
varies
with
the
difference
of
the
water
surfaces
upstream
and
downstream
from
the
bridge,
and
with
the
water
velocities
through
the
bridge
- Consider
relief
openings,
wingwalls,
realignment
of
piers
and
abutments,
embankment
slope
protection,
and
debris
deflectors
for
maximum
effectiveness.
Limitations:
- Crossing
and
stream
channel
geometry
may
preclude
this
option.
Considerations:

Construct
one or
more
relief
openings
through
the road
prism at a
location
that will
carry
excess
floodwaters.
The relief
opening
may be a
culvert or
bridge, or
multiple
culverts
or
bridges.
The
openings
should be
located at
natural
side
channels
and in
line with
heavy flow
areas
located on
the stream
overbanks.
(See
"Culverts-Plugging,")

Effectiveness:
- Generally
very
effective,
particularly
if
combined
with
appropriate
culvert
and/or
bridge
entrance
and
outlet
treatments.
- Consider
wingwalls,
embankment
slope
protection,
and
debris
deflectors
for
maximum
effectiveness.
Limitations:
- Geometry
of
drainage
area
may
preclude
this
option.
Considerations:

B.6
Construct
Bridge
Wingwalls
B.7
Install A
High Water
Overflow
Crossing
B.8
Realign
Piers
&
Abutments
B.9
Install
Additional
Bridge
Openings
or Spans
|