26.
Merrimack Mills,
Lowell, 1850,
showing the
"New
Mill" of
1845 behind the
original 1820s
mills
27.
The Merrimack
Dressing Mill,
ca. 1865. The
Dressing Mill
was built in
1863 as a
two-story
structure and
later was raised
to six stories,
with the tower
probably jacked
up in the
process.
28.
View of the
Merrimack Canal,
ca. 1880,
showing the
Dressing Mill
29.
View showing the
Merrimack
boardinghouses
and Dressing
Mill in 1929
30.
The Amoskeag
Mills,
Manchester, New
Hampshire
31.
The Salmon Falls
New Mill, 1845.
32. The
Boott Mills,
1850, as they
were originally
designed.
33.
The Boott Mills,
ca. 1870. This
view is similar
to that of
Figure 32 and
shows the
millyard in the
1860s. The mills
were joined
together with
the distinctive
stair towers,
including the
bell tower,
which remains a
landmark in
Lowell today.
34.
The Appleton
Mills, ca.
1880-1920.
Overbuilt within
their confined
layouts, many of
the Lowell
millyards failed
to achieve the
design
distinction of
the Merrimack or
the Boott Mills.
35.
The mills,
powerhouse, and
chimney of the
Lowell
Manufacturing
Company, Lowell.
|
Return
to PART I
PART II
It
is remarkable
how durable
Lowell's basic
architectural
and planning
strategies were,
surviving into
the 1850s at an
enlarged scale
but in a form
that otherwise
differed little
from Lowell's
earliest
millyard
developments.
What is more
significant,
however, is the
fact that during
the very period
that Lowell's
formula was
being applied to
the planning of
Lawrence and
Holyoke,
additions to
existing
millyards in
Lowell were
already varying
substantially
from the
original mill
type and layout.
The Merrimack
Manufacturing
Company provides
two very
important
examples of the
architectural
changes that
were taking
place. First, in
1845, the same
year that the
original Bay
State Mills were
planned in
Lawrence, the
Merrimack
Company
constructed a
large New Mill
in an elaborate
Greek Revival
style, complete
with pilasters
between every
window. And the
stairs, instead
of projecting
from the body of
the structure in
a separate ell,
were absorbed so
as to preserve
the
architectural
effect. The mill
with its
central,
pedimented gable
was placed
directly at the
foot of the
tree-lined
Dutton Street,
making it a
visual focus
from the
railroad station
in the city
center.
This
new emphasis on
architectural
style and effect
culminated in
the late 1860s
with the
construction of
the new Dressing
Mill in the same
millyard. This
building
affected the
scene far more
dramatically
than did the New
Mill,
transforming as
it did the most
important vista
in the oldest
section of
Lowell, the view
down the
Merrimack Canal.
The
Merrimack
Dressing Mill
became an
important
element in terms
of urban design
as well as
architecture.
The view looking
down the
Merrimack Canal
toward the
Dressing Mill
from the center
of Lowell - with
the original
City Hall
behind, the
original church
to the right,
and the home of
the company
agent to the
left - must have
been one of the
most impressive
architectural
compositions in
America during
the nineteenth
century. The
corporation
boardinghouses
formed a long,
almost unbroken
row on the left
beginning with
the modest,
wooden dwellings
of the first
phase and ending
with the larger,
more dramatic
"Long
Row"
constructed in
the 1840s. The
house of the
first Boott
Mills agent, the
high school, and
more houses were
lined up behind
the church on
the right. The
Dressing Mill
was the
tour-de-force,
commanding the
elm-lined canal
space and
providing a
focal point
(slightly
off-center) with
its tall
Italianate
Victorian tower.
The total view
was a masterful
composition of
elements that
fit together
into a wonderful
hierarchy of
form and detail.
Originally
the view down
the canal was
terminated by
one of the five
1822 Merrimack
mills. The space
formed by the
canal and Dutton
Street was not
conceived then
as architectural
space with its
own unique or
dramatic
character. Built
behind the older
row of mills,
the large New
Mill marked the
beginning of a
substantial
architectural
effort to
distinguish the
millyard. And it
was the Dressing
Mill that
established a
dramatic
architectural
symbol befitting
the Merrimack
Company's
prestige as the
largest and
oldest
corporation in
Lowell. In the
process the
canal became
more than a
utilitarian
source of power,
it became a
vital part of
the visual
composition
terminated by
the mill with
its tower. This
act of
establishing an
architectural
"sense of
place,"
specifically
designed to
impress, marks
the emergence of
a community
within the city
concerned with
the corporate
and civic image
-not the same
image of decency
and moral purity
remarked by
Dickens and
Chevalier, but
of local
identity, pride,
and economic
prowess.
A
strong local
community had
emerged from the
domination of
Boston residents
and at times
even found
itself in
conflict with
those interests
whose authority
seemed
threatening.
Even though the
mills remained
under the
ownership of
Boston-based
corporations
until the
twentieth
century, people
who lived in'
Lowell, whether
they worked for
the companies or
not, had an
increasing
influence on the
architectural
form of the
city, with much
of the design
and construction
of the mills and
other structures
in the city
becoming the
responsibility
of Lowell
residents.
In
Manchester,
founded twenty
years later than
Lowell, it is
interesting to
note that much
more power and
responsibility
was delegated to
local managers
earlier on, and
greater
political
autonomy was
given to the
local community
sooner than in
Lowell. The
results in terms
of design are
marked. In no
cities other
than Manchester
did the prestige
architecture of
the Victorian
era -with the
towers,
gateways, and
elaborate iron
details -find
such a close and
sympathetic
integration with
the simple, late
Federal-style
detailing of the
Lowell mills and
boardinghouses
of the first
generation of
growth.
An
important social
force was
beginning to
affect all of
the cities,
providing a
powerful
incentive for
architectural
expression
beyond the
Lowell mill and
boardinghouse
formulae. This
force may be
seen especially
well in the
experience of
Salmon Falls, a
smaller mill
community
modeled on the
Lowell plan. In
about the same
year as the
Merrimack New
Mill in Lowell,
the Salmon Falls
Company
constructed a
mill in an
almost identical
Greek Revival
style. The new
mill was
credited by the
local paper as
having "a
more finished
appearance than
we recollect
ever to have
noticed in a
factory . . .
more elegant in
outward
appearance and
interior finish
than any other
similar
structure in
America."
The
1851 Salmon
Falls Company
Directors Report
reveals that
Salmon Falls in
the later 1840s
and 1850s was
competing with
Lowell for
factory workers,
whereas
formerly:
"a
preference was
shown for Salmon
Falls
(especially by
the parents)
over the large
towns in that
vicinity and
especially over
Lowell."
(fn4) Initially
Lowell had been
beyond the
region of Salmon
Falls, but by
the 1840s, the
center of
gravity had
shifted from the
rural areas like
Salmon Falls to
the urban - even
cosmopolitan
setting that
Lowell had by
then become. The
1851 Directors
Report
continues:
"The
workers do not
include so large
a proportion of
girls from the
respectable
farmers'
families. They
can find
employment at
home. . . . The
Preference is
now given to
Lowell and the
largest
manufacturing
towns."
The
large and
impressive brick
mill was a clear
reflection of
the Salmon Falls
Company's desire
to impress
people with its
importance and
urban
sophistication,
and the new
mill's
similarity to
the Merrimack
mill was
probably more
than
coincidental.
The
building of the
Merrimack New
Mill and later
the Dressing
Mill mark a
larger shift
taking place at
this time. The
competition,
which Lowell
began to
experience, is
part of the
inevitable
process marking
the growth of an
industrially
based society.
Hitherto the
machines had
competed with
handwork, and
thus had the
market to
themselves.
During this
time, spanning
the first two
decades of
Lowell's growth,
the mills were
made as
inconspicuous as
possible so as
to be more
easily accepted
by an uncertain
public, thus
accounting for
their lack of
individuality
and up-to-date
architectural
expression. By
the 1840s these
halcyon days
were over and
the market began
to reach the
saturation
point. Wages
began to drop
and the New
England native
women gradually
left the mills,
to be replaced
by immigrants
for whom the
lower wages were
acceptable. From
the standpoint
of attracting
buyers and
investors, the
stature of a
company became
more important
than the
amenities for
attracting
workers, as the
different
companies were
thrown into
increasing
competition with
each other, and
this began to be
expressed in the
architecture of
the mills for
the first time.
While
Salmon Falls
felt threatened
by the
cosmopolitan
attraction of
Lowell, Lowell
was feeling the
pressure of a
new economic
context. It was
the first and
largest
textile-producing
city, but the
time was rapidly
approaching when
it would cease
to hold a
favored position
and instead
would have to
compete as an
equal against
its neighbors.
Lowell responded
to the
competition from
hundreds of
places like
Salmon Falls in
both areas of
production and
prestige.
Moreover, having
developed
sufficiently to
attract a local
community of
major strength,
the town of
Lowell began to
assert its civic
individuality;
it was the
town's effort to
give the
Merrimack
Company and
itself a visible
identity that
led to the
building of the
New Mill in 1845
in the
prevailing
architectural
style, which
made it almost
identical to the
one in Salmon
Falls.
Was
there a
relationship
between the
decline of
Lowell from its
so-called
utopian first
period and the
architectural
changes which
emerge from the
same period?
Frequently the
architectural
quality of a
place is seen to
parallel its
social decline,
yet these new
mills were far
more elaborate
and
distinguished
examples of
their
architectural
style than the
earlier mills
had been. In the
case of Lowell,
the relationship
of the changes
was more
complex. The
fact that many
mill buildings
such as the
Merrimack New
Mill and the
Dressing Mill
achieved a
sophisticated
architecture
does not
necessarily mean
that the
environment
became more
livable, or even
more attractive.
The shift was in
two directions:
While the
principal mills
became more
elegant and the
simple,
repetitive
designs of the
earlier mills
gave way to
unique building
forms with their
elaborate bell
towers, the
millyards on
either side
often became
darker and more
congested.
Additional mills
were built with
little thought
toward an
ultimate
planning goal.
Many of the
amenities and
landscaped
spaces around
the
boardinghouses
ceased to be
improved or even
maintained and
eventually when
the demand for
space exceeded
what was
available in the
millyard, cotton
warehouses began
to replace even
the
boardinghouses.
In
examining the
historical drama
of the
Industrial
Revolution for
its causes, one
is attracted to
the supposition
that the
invention of the
machines
precipitated the
industrial
period. But,
critical as that
invention was,
it is also
important to
understand that
this revolution
would not have
occurred in the
form that it
did, or expanded
so rapidly, had
it not been for
both the prior
accumulation of
capital and the
concurrent
expansion of the
market. For a
time, a unique
condition
existed in the
economy of
textile
production. The
first Lowell
corporations
were able to
produce cloth in
industrial
quantities while
distributing it
in a market
whose price
structure was
still shaped by
a
pre-industrialized
economy. As long
as machine goods
competed with
hand goods,
profits were
enormous and
even wages were
high. The time
soon came,
however, in the
1840s and 1850s
when machines
began to compete
with machines.
It is at that
point, and not
at the moment of
invention, that
the age of
industry as we
know it was
launched. Only
then did the
discipline of
industrial life
become complete.
The need for
maximum speed of
production had
become a
principal
ingredient of
success, and
wages, the one
flexible cost
within the
factory, had
been forced by
competition into
a major decline.
The maturation
of the
industrial
economy was a
two-stage
process, and
Lowell's
so-called
idyllic period
fell within the
first. It is
upon its
transition to
the second that
the city
experienced
fundamental
changes and
gradually lost
its reputation
as a utopian
industrial
community.
At
its best the
architecture of
the late
nineteenth
century mills
and public
buildings of
Lowell stood as
an almost heroic
expression of
individual and
corporate pride
and sense of
purpose; at its
worst it created
a dense urban
environment
which was
oppressive
without relief.
Taking its place
in the context
of the early,
staid,
conservative
environment of
the Lowell
Chevalier called
"decent,
peaceable and
sage," the
best
architecture of
the late
Victorian period
added drama and
enriched the
city's
appearance,
giving it much
of the visual
character which
survives today.
footnotes
1
For a thorough
and creative
study of the
architecture of
early Lowell,
see John
Coolidge, Mill
and Mansion,
1931.
2
C E Potter, History
of Manchester,
Manchester, N.H.,
1856
3
This should not
be confused with
the results in
Manchester and
other cities
where urban
design of a high
quality resulted
from the
subsequent
extension and
rebuilding of
the mills, etc.
4
Gordon Grimes,
"Portrait
of Salmon
Falls," New
Hampshire
Profiles,
November 1974,
p. 30
5
Grimes,
"Portrait
of Salmon
Falls," p.
30
|